For the aid to interested
persons to study and master system "EKAM", it is offered to study
more attentively the sign on system given in the title. Presented in the
form of rings, the sign not casually has such form. Its form shows essence
of uniform movement and its trajectory. The explanation of system
"EKAM" not opened in detail in an offered site, can be partially
opened independently, creatively conceiving person, through decoding of a
sign on system. The help for decoding is also that applying system
"EKAM", operates always on a trajectory designated by a sign.
Gravitation of rings of a symbol upwards, except fighting mission, speaks
an attraction to following the supreme laws to a certain extent
"spirit" laws.
Koltsov A.N.
Article #1
Article
#2
Article
#1
Fighting antagonisms as any natural phenomenon,
will be more clear when them to consider as a whole. It would Seem, simple
true, but in a life the questions arising on those or other sections of
antagonisms, even are considered by experts without a phenomenon overall
picture. As a result, the part of an overall picture pulled out from the
general context often enough incorrectly is understood. Because of it
consideration of the arisen question acquires a considerable quantity of
vast comments that thereby characterises result
as deformed.
To avoid an inaccuracy of judgements in the characteristic of fighting
antagonisms as natural phenomenon, the scheme giving an overall picture of
the device of all phenomenon is offered. In the Nature, all most durable
phenomena are result of their maximum conformity to nature laws. Under
these laws, all develops from simple to the difficult. It is necessary to
follow only to laws and the result will be shown. The analogy method for
descriptive reasons is offered. We will present fighting antagonisms in the
form of a tree growing downwards. On a tree example the pyramidal scheme of
development of the phenomena in the nature (fig. 1) is well visible.
But an indispensable condition of
not deformed understanding of the phenomenon, its conformity of an overall objective
of this phenomenon - its idea is. An overall objective of fighting
antagonisms, repayment of the begun counteraction of opponents is, and it
is better than suppression of the attempt of counteraction. It is necessary
to deviate as less as possible an overall objective, at the decision of all
questions arising at studying of fighting antagonisms.
From drawing 1 it is visible that
fighting antagonisms have a unifying beginning - top of all kaleidoscope of
variants of actions. This level naturally to name single combat.
0 - uniform action
1 - blows by hands
2 - blows by feet
3 - captures (struggle)
4 - blows by hands and feet
5 - blows by feet and captures
6 - blows by hands and captures
More low there are antagonisms.
Branches of stem-forming actions, expanding and intertwining at level of
branches, give rise to an outline of actions - here there are directions of
various antagonisms. At level of branches there are styles. Branches-styles
acquire leaves - receptions. It is necessary not to forget that leaves
represent a temporary local beamed phenomenon.
From the presented scheme all
engaged it becomes visually clear, at what level there are their interests,
and than they are engaged. Unfortunately, the majority of representatives
of fighting single combats do not rise above level of branches -
directions. Feeling intuitively feeling single combat existence (in sense
of unity), some part of the practising tries to
comprehend it. But as a result educations in the form of "brooms"
are got. It means that someone combines various "branches"
together, "connecting" their predilections - subjective
understanding values of those or other parts of all tree (its crones are
more exact). But "brooms" artificial formation and do not grow in
the nature. From here their fragility and incomplete suitability.
Certainly, there are more successful
results, in attempts to reach single combat, but at developers of successful
"brooms" will not reject a way to put general of parts, - in
general the aspiration is excessive to be focused on particulars, details,
- is extended enough. All right, when try to draw for this purpose a
national explanation. In the essence laws above personal human
predilections. While it does not become an indisputable postulate, it is
not necessary to wait for the highest results. The mathematical approach
above all for is initial in a universe. In favour
of single combat existence, it is possible to remind true that a universe
wholly, so common. Thus, the part of a universe which phenomenon of
fighting antagonisms too is has a uniform expression. It is clear that
after all told and considered there is a desire to learn that itself
represents single combat. The universal system of fight of "Ekam" also is this single combat.
If to characterise
"Ekam" also in another way, this system
simply find for the idler. Well unless it is not tempting, using uniform -
the unique way of action, as much as possible successfully to operate in
all fighting situations? However, not the economical relation to a
development way is inherent in all. Considerable enough part practising fighting antagonisms obstinately defends
exclusiveness so-called "the ways". It turns out that such people
are guided by a principle "what for simply when it is possible
difficult" or "real heroes always make a detour". Ignoring
of laws of the nature Is available again. To a certain extent, such
relation can be understood, when someone simply does not wish to trouble
itself(himself) with concept something new. The reasons for that different
and one extended enough - a successful place in any "niche" of
fighting antagonisms. When the organisation is
generated, allowing to develop to this or that business bringing certain
benefits what for, say, to strain. With such people all is clear. Them the
essence practised by them never interests. Worse
when have no serious benefits, but obstinately defend ultimate that, than
are engaged. It is equivalent to multiplication table negation.
Negation comes sometimes before that
there is enough popular belief,
ostensibly, it does not matter than from antagonisms are engaged.
Style and a direction, and personal qualities applying them are say
important not. It is clear, what in this judgement
there is a true share, but unless it is not important to be at war, for
example, with what, with an onions or the automatic machine? It is thought,
what even first-rate archer will have few chances against not so skilled submachine
gunner.
Summing up to all told, it would be
desirable to offer truly searching for true, to follow by impartiality. The
top of fighting antagonisms will be in that case inevitably reached. Then
becomes obvious that the true way - unique and accordingly, result also
will be the only thing - uniform, it is possible to tell even - uniform. On
remarks that in so-called higher or "spiritual" aspects, the top
is deprived conventions and latitude, I will answer that speaking about
spiritual, even experts confuse it to concepts "soulful". In the
spiritual spheres, all displays are especially similar - are uniform, as
the spirit - is uniform. But in a theme mentioned by me, it is a question,
basically, about a physical kind of display of top of single combats. And
here without form existence not to manage, as possessing a physical body,
the person cannot ignore displays corresponding to it any more. Means, the
top of antagonisms has the uniform form of display. So from different
directions there will be a uniform result.
In certain degree, knowing moods in
the environment of practising fighting
antagonisms, I expect from their party of the statement of disagreement
even in the face of obvious trues. Mistaking it
is ready to answer, whenever possible, questions, and irreconcilable
opponent not to be similar Fome …, and I wish to
try to know more.
Article #2
After acquaintance with previous
materials, it is thought the further explanation of the device of fighting
antagonisms, their mutual relations, merits and demerits will be more
clear. For this purpose it is offered to consider a logic chain of
development from single combat to antagonisms.
|
1. An
ideal problem
|
To extinguish the begun counteraction of
opponents, and it is better to stop counteractions in the beginning.
|
|
2. The ideal
plan
|
Proceeding from point 1, it is required versatility
actions and the highest brevity performed by point 1.
|
|
3. An
ideal way
|
Means unity actions and them uncompromising.
|
|
4. Corporal
display.
|
The account of restrictions of a planet the
Earth and bodies of the person.
|
|
5.
Strategy and fight tactics.
|
Only studying, at simplicity and balance.
|
From the presented logic chain it is visible that antagonisms
without using in 3 point unity actions, do not realise
2nd point. Because of it in 4th point fighting antagonisms are shown
through various ways of actions that in turn conducts to vicious ways of
conducting fight. And it leads to point 5 default. As a result there is an
increase in time of fight that does not give possibility to be carried out
to problems of point 2 and further point 1.
Deviation from an ideal
problem leads to that some of fans of antagonisms try to increase time of
existence of the phenomenon practised by them.
But it is the roughest error. Initially, the phenomenon of fighting
antagonisms concerns the creative phenomena, for it in the problem self-destruction.
It so! And attempts to give to it other characteristic are slyness or
ignorance. More often in advantage constructive endeavour
fighting antagonisms put forward judgement about them, ostensibly,
possibilities to promote growth of all "spiritual" qualities. But
this slyness. It is not necessary at all, for comprehension of the mission
and understanding of other things, to be engaged in the phenomenon
initially supposing restriction of freedom of other people and supposing
their finishing to traumas and even moreover. So it is not necessary to
confuse concepts. If and "smells as spirit" in antagonisms it is
very weak. Fondly to think that through blows and captures the person
becomes purer and even more spiritually. Unfortunately, more often on the
contrary. Though some and can benefit by antagonisms for understanding of
laws of a universe. But nevertheless, to each phenomenon - the. For soul
and spirit development, is other, more direct way in which it is not
obligatory even in the form of fighting dance (as Tai Ji
Quan and so forth) to simulate fighting body
movements. By the way, the highest devotees of spirit, easy do without
antagonisms, and their "wonder-working" possibilities even do not
dream experts of fighting antagonisms. It is necessary to concern impartially
the considered phenomenon and to cease to try to give it not peculiar
qualities. If to go obstinate, why then not to try to justify existence
possibility, for example, fighting arithmetics.
Koltsov A.N.
Up
